Test

This will translate this blog to speech.

A blog that will gradually post the results of a study of the bees found by refuge biologists and volunteers using bee bowls traps on USFWS Region 5 National Wildlife Refuges in the Northeastern United States.

Showing posts with label national wildlife refuge. Show all posts
Showing posts with label national wildlife refuge. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Eastern Shore of Virginia National Wildlife Refuge - Headquarters

This is a summary of bee data from 4 sampling locations from Eastern Shore of Virginia National Wildlife Refuge collected in early August 2008. Each field was sampled with 5 fluorescent yellow, 5 fluorescent blue, and 5 white 3.25 ounce bowl traps.

A complete table of the data is available from Leo Shapiro (lshapiro@umd.edu), Sam Droege (sdroege@usgs.gov), or the refuge biologist.

Below is a table of the site numbers and a brief site description followed by a table of results.


Description Number

ESVA Site 4 (Visitor Center) 5549
ESVA Site 1 (Maintenance) 5546
ESVA Site 2 (Housing) 5547
ESVA Site 3 (Seaside Rd) 5548


Results

name 5549 5546 5547 5548 Grand Total
Agapostemon virescens 32 2 7 14 55
Augochlorella aurata 96 5 12 171 284
Ceratina calcarata 2 2 11 1 16
Ceratina dupla 15 6 35 6 62
Halictus ligatis/poeyi 4
8 14 26
Lassioglossum bruneri 1 1 2 1 5
Lassioglossum coreopsis
1 1 1 3
Lassioglossum near planatum 1


1
Lassioglossum oblongum
1

1
Lassioglossum pectorale


2 2
Lassioglossum tegulare 3
7 6 16
Lassioglossum versatum 6


6
Lassioglossum versatumsensumitchell 4
1
5
Grand Total 164 18 84 216 482

Sampling Locations


This set of bowl surveys were placed on the lawns surrounding the visitor center and headquarters complex. Interestingly, despite being on what one would suppose to be less than prime real estate as compared to natural fields, there are huge numbers of bees captured here--on average 8 bees per bowl trap! Despite the large numbers, however, the diversity is low for such a populous catch. These species are associated with disturbed and lawn habitats throughout the region. In our studies of the Memorial Grounds in the center of Washington D.C., for example, we get approximately the same list. Another possible factor may be time of year: in this case the survey was made in early August, while the other samples from the study were from late August and September.

With the exception of the Ceratina species all the species are members of the family Halictidae. These species are all generalists and seem especially adept at colonizing and using the small often weedy flower resources in areas cut regularly. The Lasioglossum versatum and the L. versatumsensumitchell are 2 very similar species that have been shown to differ genetically, but separating the two species visually is a bit tricky. We have a feeling that most of these may be L. versatumsensumitchell rather than L. versatum, but aren't quite sure. Augochlorella aurata is perhaps the most common bee in the region and found in almost all open habitats. The Halictus species are likely to be H. poeyi, but the separation of these species hasn't been resolved.

Interestingly, while each of the sites had about the same species list, the number of bees captured in each field varied quite at bit. Little study has gone into explaining such differences and thus there is plenty of room for further study of even the most basic of factors affecting bee distributions.


Augochlorella aurata - Photo by John Pascarella

Thursday, January 8, 2009

Rappahhannock River Valley NWR

This is a summary of bee data from 5 fields on the Rappahannock River Valley NWR collected on August 13th and 14th 2008. Each field was sampled with 5 fluorescent yellow, 5 fluorescent blue, and 5 white 3.25 ounce bowl traps.

A complete table of the data is available from Leo Shapiro (lshapiro@umd.edu), Sam Droege (sdroege@usgs.gov), or the refuge biologist.

Below is a table of the site numbers and the brief site description.

Description Site
Wilna Unit 1 5607
Wilna Unit 2 5608
Wilna Unit B 5609
Wilna Unit 4 5610
Wilna Unit 7 5611

Below is a table of the results by site:

Species
5607 5608 5609 5610 5611 Grand Total
Agapostemon virescens 5 1 2 1 5 14
Augochlora pura



1 1
Augochlorella aurata

2

2
Bombus griseocollis



1 1
Halictus ligatus/poeyi 1 1 1

3
Hylaeus affinis/modestus

1

1
Lasioglossum bruneri



1 1
Lasioglossum coreopsis

2

2
Lasioglossum creberrimum


1
1
Lasioglossum versatumsensumitchell 1
2

3
Melissodes bimaculata



1 1
Melissodes comptoides 1
3 4 31 39
Melisssodes denticulata



1 1
Ptilothrix bombiformis



1 1
Svastra atripes

1

1
Triepeolus lunatus
1


1
Grand Total 8 3 14 6 42 73

Another interesting set of fields. Note all the Eucerine species (Melissodes and Svastra), which are usually good indicators of high quality habitat with plenty of large composites available in the landscape (especially true for Svastra). Also note that one of their relatively uncommon nest parasites was also caught (Triepeolus lunatus).

Two additional species worth noting, Lasioglossum creberrimum and Ptilothrix bombiformis, are both good indicators that wetlands are in the area. Lasioglossum creberrimum is usually associated with low wet coastal areas (ding!) and P. bombiformis is usually associated with Hibiscus plants, which I imagine must line the tidal wetlands nearby. Interestingly, you can also get P. bombiformis in the city, where they hang out on streetcorners sipping sweet drinks from other mallow plants such as Rose of Sharon.

Lasioglossum versatum sensu Mitchell is a species that likes southern coastal plain habitats. Its odd name comes from the fact that its taxonomic identity is being challenged and recent (but unpublished findings) indicate that this thing matches what Mitchell described as L. versatum but in actuality does not match the type specimen of L. versatum. The taxonomists will work it out in the near future and a new name will be given.

With respect to patterns among fields, there is a lot of conformity among these neighboring fields as far as species types and numbers go. No field appears much different from the others except that Field 5611 has pumped up numbers of M. comptoides for some unknowable reason. All and all I think this refuge is a keeper.

We are in luck in that Sandy has provided some pictures of these fields. They are posted below...


Sam Droege and Leo Shapiro

Listen to six mockingbirds
Flinging follies of O-be-joyful
Over the marshes and uplands.
- Carl Sandburg: Prairie



Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Rhode Island NWR Complex

All:

This is a summary of data from 8 fields from the Rhode Island NWR Complex during late August 2008.

A complete table of the data is available from Leo Shapiro (lshapiro@umd.edu), Sam Droege (sdroege@usgs.gov), or the refuge biologist.

Below is a table of the site numbers and the brief site description.

SiteDescription
5558RINWRC Site 1;Ninigret NWR
5559RINWRC Site 2;Ninigret NWR
5560RINWRC Site 3;Ninigret NWR
5561RINWRC Site 4;Ninigret NWR
5562RINWRC Site 5;Trustom Pond NWR
5563RINWRC Site 6;Trustom Pond NWR
5564RINWRC Site 7;Trustom Pond NWR
5565RINWRC Site 8;Trustom Pond NWR



Below is a table of the results by site:


Species55585559556055615562556355645565Grand Total
Agapostemon texanus11





2
Agapostemon virescens
3
21197133
Andrena brevipalpis1






1
Anthidium manicatum



2


2
Apis mellifera



1

12
Augochlorella aurata
11
1
249
Augochloropsis metallica






11
Bombus impatiens




1

1
Ceratina calcarata

1


135
Ceratina calcarata/dupla
1





1
Ceratina dupla3111121212
Coelioxys sayi






11
Colletes americanus





1
1
Halictus confusus



1


1
Halictus ligatus61216111129
Hylaeus affinis/modestus1


31139
Lasioglossum anomalum






11
Lasioglossum cressonii





2
2
Lasioglossum ellisiae1110
7101


39
Lasioglossum imitatum
1





1
Lasioglossum nymphaearum




1
12
Lasioglossum pectorale
1



1
2
Lasioglossum pilosum145271
1131
Lasioglossum rohweri291
12211138
Lasioglossum sp.



122
5
Megachile brevis



1

12
Megachile latimanus




1

1
Megachile montivaga




1

1
Melissodes bimaculata
1





1
Sphecodes atlantis1

2



3
Sphecodes davisii






11
Sphecodes dichrous



1


1
Grand Total4046142838213123241


Interpretation of the results: Excellent number of bees and diversity in these fields! 30 species, 241 specimens, which comes to about 2 bees on average per bowl. First let's note a set of new state records for Rhode Island based on the list maintained by John Ascher at the American Museum: Augochloropsis metallica, Lasioglossum anomalum, Anthidium manicatum, Megachile montivaga, and Coelioxys sayi. Now before the refuge's head gets too swollen, the list of bees for the Rhode Island is low and all these species have been found in neighboring states, but on the other hand it shows the type of contribution that can be made in light of a general lack of understanding of bees....so good work!

Anthidium manicatum is an interesting new arrival to the U.S. Here's the current distribution (and a few West Coast records that are not shown). Moving north and west it will likely soon cover the region. It is particularly fond of nice gardens that have Stachys, which it uses to line its nests.




Anthidium manicatum by imarsman from creative commons



Lasioglossum ellisiae would have been called L. tegulare in the recent past, but there is a paper in review that splits these two apart. The Lasioglossum sp. are all males that at this point I can't identify to species. There are an interesting number of nest parasites in this group of bees (these are bees that lay their eggs in the nests of other bee species rather than providing for their young themselves). The 3 Sphecodes are parasites of Lasioglossum species and the Coelioxys sayi is a parasite of Megachile bees.


Ninigret fields have many more H. ligatus, L. ellisiae, and L. pilosum than Trustom pond, which is more characterized by higher numbers of Agapostemon virescens and Hylaeus. Based on the species list it looks like the Ninigret fields are more open and potentially sandy, but they don't have any of the species that are characteristic of deep sand. The species diversity at Ninigret is much lower at 15 species to Trustom's 26. Again, a nice set of bees for this refuge complex.

Sam and Leo

Bee Song



Bees in the late summer sun

Drone their song

Of yellow moons

Trimming black velvet

Droning, droning a sleepysong.




- Carl Sandburg

Site 5565

Site 5564

Site 5563

Site 5562

Site 5561

Site 5560

Site 5559

Site 5558


Followers

About Me

My photo
With Natural History there is no need to go to the moon or Madagascar; there is more to find in your woodlot than in our entire solar system.